This vote is cancelled in favor of rc6.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm cancelling this vote in favor of rc6. > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-1.0.0-rc5/ >>> >>> Good news is that the sigs, MD5 and SHA are all correct. >>> >>> Tiny note: the Maven artifacts use SHA1, while the binary artifacts >>> use SHA512, which took me a bit of head-scratching to figure out. >>> >>> If another RC comes out, I might suggest making it SHA1 everywhere? >>> But there is nothing wrong with these signatures and checksums. >>> >>> Now to look at the contents... >> >> This is a bit of drudgery that probably needs to be done too: a review >> of the LICENSE and NOTICE file. Having dumped the licenses of >> dependencies, I don't believe these reflect all of the software that's >> going to be distributed in 1.0. >> >> (Good news is there's no forbidden license stuff included AFAICT.) >> >> And good news is that NOTICE can be auto-generated, largely, with a >> Maven plugin. This can be done manually for now. >> >> And there is a license plugin that will list all known licenses of >> transitive dependencies so that LICENSE can be filled out fairly >> easily. >> >> What say? want a JIRA with details?
