Could someone please clarify my confusion or is this not an issue that we should be concerned about?
Thanks, Rahul Singhal On 30/05/14 5:28 PM, "Rahul Singhal" <rahul.sing...@guavus.com> wrote: >Is it intentional/ok that the tag v1.0.0 is behind tag v1.0.0-rc11? > > >Thanks, >Rahul Singhal > > > > > >On 30/05/14 3:43 PM, "Patrick Wendell" <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>I'm thrilled to announce the availability of Spark 1.0.0! Spark 1.0.0 >>is a milestone release as the first in the 1.0 line of releases, >>providing API stability for Spark's core interfaces. >> >>Spark 1.0.0 is Spark's largest release ever, with contributions from >>117 developers. I'd like to thank everyone involved in this release - >>it was truly a community effort with fixes, features, and >>optimizations contributed from dozens of organizations. >> >>This release expands Spark's standard libraries, introducing a new SQL >>package (SparkSQL) which lets users integrate SQL queries into >>existing Spark workflows. MLlib, Spark's machine learning library, is >>expanded with sparse vector support and several new algorithms. The >>GraphX and Streaming libraries also introduce new features and >>optimizations. Spark's core engine adds support for secured YARN >>clusters, a unified tool for submitting Spark applications, and >>several performance and stability improvements. Finally, Spark adds >>support for Java 8 lambda syntax and improves coverage of the Java and >>Python API's. >> >>Those features only scratch the surface - check out the release notes >>here: >>http://spark.apache.org/releases/spark-release-1-0-0.html >> >>Note that since release artifacts were posted recently, certain >>mirrors may not have working downloads for a few hours. >> >>- Patrick >
