+1 since this is already the de facto model we are using. On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Wangfei (X) <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > 发自我的 iPhone > > > 在 2014年11月5日，20:06，"Denny Lee" <[email protected]> 写道： > > > > +1 great idea. > >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 20:04 Xiangrui Meng <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Mark Hamstra <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> +1 (binding) > >>> > >>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Nicholas Chammas < > >> [email protected] > >>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 on this proposal. > >>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Nan Zhu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Will these maintainers have a cleanup for those pending PRs upon we > >> start > >>>>> to apply this model? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I second Nan's question. I would like to see this initiative drive a > >>>> reduction in the number of stale PRs we have out there. We're > >> approaching > >>>> 300 open PRs again. > >>>> > >>>> Nick > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
