Thanks for the responses. How would something like HadamardProduct or similar be in order to keep it explicit? Would still be a VectorTransformer so the name and trait would hopefully lead to a somewhat self-documenting class.
Xiangrui, do you mean Hadamard product or transform? My initial proposal was only a vector-vector product, but I can extend this to matrices. The transform would require a bit more work, which I'm willing to do, but I'm not sure where FFT comes in, can you elaborate? -- View this message in context: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Any-interest-in-weighting-VectorTransformer-which-does-component-wise-scaling-tp10265p10355.html Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
