You can possibly raise a JIRA ticket for feature and start working on it, once done you can send a pull request with the code changes.
Thanks Best Regards On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Joel Zambrano <jo...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Thanks Akhil! For the one where I change the rest client, how likely > would it be that a change like that goes thru? Would it be rejected as an > uncommon scenario? I really don't want to have this as a separate form of > the branch. > > Thanks, > Joel > ------------------------------ > *From:* Akhil Das <ak...@sigmoidanalytics.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:07:08 AM > *To:* Joel Zambrano > *Cc:* dev@spark.apache.org > *Subject:* Re: RestSubmissionClient Basic Auth > > Either way is fine. Relay proxy would be much easier, adding > authentication to the REST client would require you to rebuild and test the > piece of code that you wrote for authentication. > > Thanks > Best Regards > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Joel Zambrano <jo...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> Hi! We have a gateway with basic auth that relays calls to the head >> node in our cluster. Is adding support for basic auth the wrong approach? >> Should we use a relay proxy? I’ve seen the code and it would probably >> require adding a few configs and appending the header on the get and post >> request of the REST submission client. >> >> >> >> A best strategy would be greatly appreciated. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Joel >> > >
