+1 tested SparkR on Mac and Linux. --Hossein
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Xiangrui Meng <men...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1. Checked user guide and API doc, and ran some MLlib and SparkR > examples. -Xiangrui > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > > I'm going to +1 this myself. Tested on my laptop. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I forked a new thread for this. Please discuss NOTICE file related > things > >> there so it doesn't hijack this thread. > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Richard Hillegas <rhil...@us.ibm.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Under your guidance, I would be happy to help compile a NOTICE file > >>> > which > >>> > follows the pattern used by Derby and the JDK. This effort might > >>> > proceed in > >>> > parallel with vetting 1.5.1 and could be targeted at a later release > >>> > vehicle. I don't think that the ASF's exposure is greatly increased > by > >>> > one > >>> > more release which follows the old pattern. > >>> > >>> I'd prefer to use the ASF's preferred pattern, no? That's what we've > >>> been trying to do and seems like we're even required to do so, not > >>> follow a different convention. There is some specific guidance there > >>> about what to add, and not add, to these files. Specifically, because > >>> the AL2 requires downstream projects to embed the contents of NOTICE, > >>> the guidance is to only include elements in NOTICE that must appear > >>> there. > >>> > >>> Put it this way -- what would you like to change specifically? (you > >>> can start another thread for that) > >>> > >>> >> My assessment (just looked before I saw Sean's email) is the same as > >>> >> his. The NOTICE file embeds other projects' licenses. > >>> > > >>> > This may be where our perspectives diverge. I did not find those > >>> > licenses > >>> > embedded in the NOTICE file. As I see it, the licenses are cited but > >>> > not > >>> > included. > >>> > >>> Pretty sure that was meant to say that NOTICE embeds other projects' > >>> "notices", not licenses. And those notices can have all kinds of > >>> stuff, including licenses. > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org > >>> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org > >
