Python bindings for GraphX are still in development - see 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3789?jql=project%20%3D%20SPARK%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20GraphX%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC
 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3789?jql=project%20=%20SPARK%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20=%20GraphX%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC>
 for the latest.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robin East
Spark GraphX in Action Michael Malak and Robin East
Manning Publications Co.
http://www.manning.com/books/spark-graphx-in-action 
<http://www.manning.com/books/spark-graphx-in-action>





> On 7 Dec 2015, at 02:16, 张志强(旺轩) <zzq98...@alibaba-inc.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes,
>  
> We already used ALS in our production environment, we also want to try SVD++ 
> but it has no python interface.
>  
> Any idea? Thanks
>  
> -Allen
>  
> 发件人: Yanbo Liang [mailto:yblia...@gmail.com <mailto:yblia...@gmail.com>] 
> 发送时间: 2015年12月3日 10:30
> 收件人: 张志强(旺轩)
> 抄送: dev@spark.apache.org <mailto:dev@spark.apache.org>
> 主题: Re: query on SVD++
>  
> You means the SVDPlusPlus in GraphX? If you want to use SVD++ to train CF 
> model, I recommend you to use ALS which is more efficiency and has python 
> interface.
>  
> 2015-12-02 11:21 GMT+08:00 张志强(旺轩) <zzq98...@alibaba-inc.com 
> <mailto:zzq98...@alibaba-inc.com>>:
> Hi All,
>  
> I came across the SVD++ algorithm implementation in Spark code base, but I 
> was wondering why we didn’t expose the scala api interface to python?
> Any plan to do this?
>  
> BR,
> -Allen Zhang

Reply via email to