+1 On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Nicholas Chammas <nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Red Hat supports Python 2.6 on REHL 5 until 2020, but otherwise yes, Python > 2.6 is ancient history and the core Python developers stopped supporting it > in 2013. REHL 5 is not a good enough reason to continue support for Python > 2.6 IMO. > > We should aim to support Python 2.7 and Python 3.3+ (which I believe we > currently do). > > Nick > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 8:01 AM Allen Zhang <allenzhang...@126.com> wrote: >> >> plus 1, >> >> we are currently using python 2.7.2 in production environment. >> >> >> >> >> >> 在 2016-01-05 18:11:45,"Meethu Mathew" <meethu.mat...@flytxt.com> 写道: >> >> +1 >> We use Python 2.7 >> >> Regards, >> >> Meethu Mathew >> >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: >>> >>> Does anybody here care about us dropping support for Python 2.6 in Spark >>> 2.0? >>> >>> Python 2.6 is ancient, and is pretty slow in many aspects (e.g. json >>> parsing) when compared with Python 2.7. Some libraries that Spark depend on >>> stopped supporting 2.6. We can still convince the library maintainers to >>> support 2.6, but it will be extra work. I'm curious if anybody still uses >>> Python 2.6 to run Spark. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >> >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org