I mean from the perspective of someone developing Spark, it makes things more complicated. It's just my point of view, people that actually support Spark deployments may have a different opinion ;)
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Jakob Odersky <ja...@odersky.com> wrote: > You can, but since it's going to be a maintainability issue I would > argue it is in fact a problem. > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> Hi Jakob, >> >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Jakob Odersky <ja...@odersky.com> wrote: >>> Reynold's 3rd point is particularly strong in my opinion. Supporting >>> Consider what would happen if Spark 2.0 doesn't require Java 8 and >>> hence not support Scala 2.12. Will it be stuck on an older version >>> until 3.0 is out? >> >> That's a false choice. You can support 2.10 (or 2.11) on Java 7 and >> 2.12 on Java 8. >> >> I'm not saying it's a great idea, just that what you're suggesting >> isn't really a problem. >> >> -- >> Marcelo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
