On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I know the name might be confusing, but I also think that the projects have
> a very big synergy, more like sibling projects, where "Spark Extras" extends
> the Spark community and develop/maintain components for, and pretty much
> only for, Apache Spark.  Based on your comment above, if making the project
> "Spark-Extras" a more acceptable name, I believe this is ok as well.

This also grants special status to a third-party project. It's not
clear this should be *the* official unofficial third-party Spark
project over some other one. If something's to be blessed, it should
be in the Spark project.

And why isn't it in the Spark project? the argument was that these
bits were not used and pretty de minimis as code. It's not up to me or
anyone else to tell you code X isn't useful to you. But arguing X
should be a TLP asserts it is substantial and of broad interest, since
there's non-zero effort for volunteers to deal with it. I am not sure
I've heard anyone argue that -- or did I miss it? because removing
bits of unused code happens all the time and isn't a bad precedent or
even unusual.

It doesn't actually enable any more cooperation than is already
possible with any other project (like Kafka, Mesos, etc). You can run
the same governance model anywhere you like. I realize literally being
operated under the ASF banner is something different.

What I hear here is a proposal to make an unofficial official Spark
project as a TLP, that begins with these fairly inconsequential
extras. I question the value of that on its face. Example: what goes
into this project? deleted Spark code only? or is this a glorified
"contrib" folder with a lower and somehow different bar determined by
different people?

And at that stage... is it really helping to give that special status?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to