Ted - what's the "bq" thing? Are you using some 3rd party (e.g. Atlassian)
syntax? They are not being rendered in email.


On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:

> bq. it's actually in use right now in spite of not being in any upstream
> HBase release
>
> If it is not in upstream, then it is not relevant for discussion on Apache
> mailing list.
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Alright, if you prefer, I'll say "it's actually in use right now in
>> spite of not being in any upstream HBase release", and it's more
>> useful than a single example file in the Spark repo for those who
>> really want to integrate with HBase.
>>
>> Spark's example is really very trivial (just uses one of HBase's input
>> formats), which makes it not very useful as a blueprint for developing
>> HBase apps with Spark.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > bq. I wouldn't call it "incomplete".
>> >
>> > I would call it incomplete.
>> >
>> > Please see HBASE-15333 'Enhance the filter to handle short, integer,
>> long,
>> > float and double' which is a bug fix.
>> >
>> > Please exclude presence of related of module in vendor distro from this
>> > discussion.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > I want to note that the hbase-spark module in HBase is incomplete.
>> Zhan
>> >> > has
>> >> > several patches pending review.
>> >>
>> >> I wouldn't call it "incomplete". Lots of functionality is there, which
>> >> doesn't mean new ones, or more efficient implementations of existing
>> >> ones, can't be added.
>> >>
>> >> > hbase-spark module is currently only in master branch which would be
>> >> > released as 2.0
>> >>
>> >> Just as a side note, it's part of CDH 5.7.0, not that it matters much
>> >> for upstream HBase.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Marcelo
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcelo
>>
>
>

Reply via email to