Quite curious about the benefits of using HDFS as shuffle service, also
what's the problem of using current shuffle service?


Thanks
Saisai

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Timothy Chen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Are you suggesting to have shuffle service persist and fetch data with
> hdfs, or skip shuffle service altogether and just write to hdfs?
>
> Tim
>
>
> > On Apr 26, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Michael Gummelt <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Has there been any thought or work on this (or any other networked file
> system)?  It would be valuable to support dynamic allocation without
> depending on the shuffle service.
> >
> > --
> > Michael Gummelt
> > Software Engineer
> > Mesosphere
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to