Hi, In certain cases (mostly due to time constraints), we need some model to run without cross validation. In such a case, since k-fold value for cross validator cannot be one, we have to maintain two different code paths to achieve both the scenarios (with and without cross validation).
Would it be an okay idea to generalize the cross validator so it can work with k-fold value of 1? The only purpose for this is to avoid maintaining two different code paths and in functionality it should be similar to as if the cross validation is not present. -- View this message in context: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Cross-Validator-to-work-with-K-Fold-value-of-1-tp17404.html Sent from the Apache Spark Developers List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
