Hi Alexander,

I think it does not guarantee to be right if an arbitrary Partitioner is passed 
in.

I have created a notebook and you can check it out. 
(https://databricks-prod-cloudfront.cloud.databricks.com/public/4027ec902e239c93eaaa8714f173bcfc/7973071962862063/2110745399505739/58107563000366/latest.html
 
<https://databricks-prod-cloudfront.cloud.databricks.com/public/4027ec902e239c93eaaa8714f173bcfc/7973071962862063/2110745399505739/58107563000366/latest.html>)

Best regards,

Yang


> 在 2016年6月9日,上午11:42,Alexander Pivovarov <apivova...@gmail.com> 写道:
> 
> most of the RDD methods which shuffle data take Partitioner as a parameter
> 
> But rdd.distinct does not have such signature
> 
> Should I open a PR for that?
> 
> /**
>  * Return a new RDD containing the distinct elements in this RDD.
>  */
> def distinct(partitioner: Partitioner)(implicit ord: Ordering[T] = null): 
> RDD[T] = withScope {
>   map(x => (x, null)).reduceByKey(partitioner, (x, y) => x).map(_._1)
> }

Reply via email to