I think a VOTE is over-thinking it, and is rarely used, but, can't hurt. Nah, anyone can call a vote. This really isn't that formal. We just want to declare and document consensus.
I think SPIP is just a remix of existing process anyway, and don't think it will actually do much anyway, which is why I am sanguine about the whole thing. To bring this to a conclusion, I will just put the contents of the doc in an email tomorrow for a VOTE. Raise any objections now. On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:39 PM Cody Koeninger <c...@koeninger.org> wrote: > I started this idea as a fork with a merge-able change to docs. > Reynold moved it to his google doc, and has suggested during this > email thread that a vote should occur. > If a vote needs to occur, I can't see anything on > http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html suggesting that I can call > for a vote, which is why I'm asking PMC members to do it since they're > the ones who would vote anyway. > Now Sean is saying this is a code/doc change that can just be reviewed > and merged as usual...which is what I tried to do to begin with. > > The fact that you haven't agreed on a process to agree on your process > is, I think, an indication that the process really does need > improvement ;) > >
