+1 (non-binding) Dongjoon.
From: Ryan Blue <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 9:06 AM To: Tom Graves <[email protected]> Cc: Marcelo Vanzin <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [SPIP] SPARK-18085: Better History Server scalability +1 (non-binding) On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Tom Graves <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1. Tom On Monday, July 31, 2017, 12:28:02 PM CDT, Marcelo Vanzin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hey all, Following the SPIP process, I'm putting this SPIP up for a vote. It's been open for comments as an SPIP for about 3 weeks now, and had been open without the SPIP label for about 9 months before that. There has been no new feedback since it was tagged as an SPIP, so I'm assuming all the people who looked at it are OK with the current proposal. The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your vote: +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP. +0: Don't really care. -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following technical reasons. Thanks! -- Marcelo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> -- Ryan Blue Software Engineer Netflix
