Yea I don't think it's a good idea to upload a doc and then call for a vote immediately. People need time to digest ...
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 6:22 AM, Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry let's remove the VOTE tag as I just wanna bring this up for > discussion. > > I'll restart the voting process after we have enough discussion on the > JIRA ticket or here in this email thread. > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Russell Spitzer < > russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> -1, I don't think there has really been any discussion of this api change >> yet or at least it hasn't occurred on the jira ticket >> >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:05 AM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> adding my own +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Following the SPIP process, I'm putting this SPIP up for a vote. >>>> >>>> The current data source API doesn't work well because of some >>>> limitations like: no partitioning/bucketing support, no columnar read, hard >>>> to support more operator push down, etc. >>>> >>>> I'm proposing a Data Source API V2 to address these problems, please >>>> read the full document at https://issues.apache.org/jira >>>> /secure/attachment/12882332/SPIP%20Data%20Source%20API%20V2.pdf >>>> >>>> Since this SPIP is mostly about APIs, I also created a prototype and >>>> put java docs on these interfaces, so that it's easier to review these >>>> interfaces and discuss: https://github.com/cl >>>> oud-fan/spark/pull/10/files >>>> >>>> The vote will be up for the next 72 hours. Please reply with your vote: >>>> >>>> +1: Yeah, let's go forward and implement the SPIP. >>>> +0: Don't really care. >>>> -1: I don't think this is a good idea because of the following >>>> technical reasons. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>> >>> >
