+1 Tested SparkR package manually on multiple platforms and checked different Hadoop release jar.
And previously tested the last RC on different R releases (see the last RC vote thread) I found some differences in bin release jars created by the different options when running the make-release script, created this JIRA to track https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22202 I've checked to confirm these exist in 2.1.1 release so this isn't a regression, and hence my +1. btw, I think we need to update this file for the new keys used in signing this release https://www.apache.org/dist/spark/KEYS _____________________________ From: Liwei Lin <lwl...@gmail.com<mailto:lwl...@gmail.com>> Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 6:51 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Spark 2.1.2 (RC4) To: Spark dev list <dev@spark.apache.org<mailto:dev@spark.apache.org>> +1 (non-binding) Cheers, Liwei On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Nick Pentreath <nick.pentre...@gmail.com<mailto:nick.pentre...@gmail.com>> wrote: Ah right! Was using a new cloud instance and didn't realize I was logged in as root! thanks On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 at 21:13 Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com<mailto:van...@cloudera.com>> wrote: Maybe you're running as root (or the admin account on your OS)? On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Nick Pentreath <nick.pentre...@gmail.com<mailto:nick.pentre...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hmm I'm consistently getting this error in core tests: > > - SPARK-3697: ignore directories that cannot be read. *** FAILED *** > 2 was not equal to 1 (FsHistoryProviderSuite.scala:146) > > > Anyone else? Any insight? Perhaps it's my set up. > >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 7:24 AM Holden Karau >>> <hol...@pigscanfly.ca<mailto:hol...@pigscanfly.ca>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version >>>> 2.1.2. The vote is open until Saturday October 7th at 9:00 PST and passes >>>> if >>>> a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.1.2 >>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >>>> >>>> >>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see https://spark.apache.org/ >>>> >>>> The tag to be voted on is v2.1.2-rc4 >>>> (2abaea9e40fce81cd4626498e0f5c28a70917499) >>>> >>>> List of JIRA tickets resolved in this release can be found with this >>>> filter. >>>> >>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: >>>> https://home.apache.org/~holden/spark-2.1.2-rc4-bin/ >>>> >>>> Release artifacts are signed with a key from: >>>> https://people.apache.org/~holden/holdens_keys.asc >>>> >>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1252 >>>> >>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: >>>> https://people.apache.org/~holden/spark-2.1.2-rc4-docs/ >>>> >>>> >>>> FAQ >>>> >>>> How can I help test this release? >>>> >>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking an >>>> existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then >>>> reporting any regressions. >>>> >>>> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install >>>> the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala you >>>> can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test with the >>>> RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so you don't end >>>> up building with a out of date RC going forward). >>>> >>>> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 2.1.2? >>>> >>>> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug >>>> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should be >>>> worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to 2.1.3. >>>> >>>> But my bug isn't fixed!??! >>>> >>>> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the release >>>> unless the bug in question is a regression from 2.1.1. That being said if >>>> there is something which is a regression form 2.1.1 that has not been >>>> correctly targeted please ping a committer to help target the issue (you >>>> can >>>> see the open issues listed as impacting Spark 2.1.1 & 2.1.2) >>>> >>>> What are the unresolved issues targeted for 2.1.2? >>>> >>>> At this time there are no open unresolved issues. >>>> >>>> Is there anything different about this release? >>>> >>>> This is the first release in awhile not built on the AMPLAB Jenkins. >>>> This is good because it means future releases can more easily be built and >>>> signed securely (and I've been updating the documentation in >>>> https://github.com/apache/spark-website/pull/66 as I progress), however the >>>> chances of a mistake are higher with any change like this. If there >>>> something you normally take for granted as correct when checking a release, >>>> please double check this time :) >>>> >>>> Should I be committing code to branch-2.1? >>>> >>>> Thanks for asking! Please treat this stage in the RC process as "code >>>> freeze" so bug fixes only. If you're uncertain if something should be back >>>> ported please reach out. If you do commit to branch-2.1 please tag your >>>> JIRA >>>> issue fix version for 2.1.3 and if we cut another RC I'll move the 2.1.3 >>>> fixed into 2.1.2 as appropriate. >>>> >>>> What happened to RC3? >>>> >>>> Some R+zinc interactions kept it from getting out the door. >>>> -- >>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >> >> > -- Marcelo
