+1.

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Matei Zaharia <matei.zaha...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 from me too.
>
> Matei
>
> > On Nov 3, 2017, at 4:59 PM, Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1.
> >
> > I think this architecture makes a lot of sense to let executors talk to
> source/sink directly, and bring very low latency.
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > +0 simply because I don't feel I know enough to have an opinion. I have
> no reason to doubt the change though, from a skim through the doc.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:37 PM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote:
> > Earlier I sent out a discussion thread for CP in Structured Streaming:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20928
> >
> > It is meant to be a very small, surgical change to Structured Streaming
> to enable ultra-low latency. This is great timing because we are also
> designing and implementing data source API v2. If designed properly, we can
> have the same data source API working for both streaming and batch.
> >
> >
> > Following the SPIP process, I'm putting this SPIP up for a vote.
> >
> > +1: Let's go ahead and design / implement the SPIP.
> > +0: Don't really care.
> > -1: I do not think this is a good idea for the following reasons.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to