We found two classes new to Spark 2.3.0 that must be registered in Kryo for
our tests to pass on RC2

org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.BasicWriteTaskStats
org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.ExecutedWriteSummary

https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam/pull/1897

Perhaps a mention in release notes?

   michael


On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:29 AM, Nick Pentreath <nick.pentre...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> All MLlib QA JIRAs resolved. Looks like SparkR too, so from the ML side
> that should be everything outstanding.
>
>
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 at 06:21 Yin Huai <yh...@databricks.com> wrote:
>
>> seems we are not running tests related to pandas in pyspark tests (see my
>> email "python tests related to pandas are skipped in jenkins"). I think we
>> should fix this test issue and make sure all tests are good before cutting
>> RC3.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Sameer Agarwal <samee...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just a quick status update on RC3 -- SPARK-23274
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23274> was resolved
>>> yesterday and tests have been quite healthy throughout this week and the
>>> last. I'll cut the new RC as soon as the remaining blocker (SPARK-23202
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23202>) is resolved.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30 January 2018 at 10:12, Andrew Ash <and...@andrewash.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd like to nominate SPARK-23274
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23274> as a potential
>>>> blocker for the 2.3.0 release as well, due to being a regression from
>>>> 2.2.0.  The ticket has a simple repro included, showing a query that works
>>>> in prior releases but now fails with an exception in the catalyst 
>>>> optimizer.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Sameer Agarwal <sameer.a...@gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This vote has failed due to a number of aforementioned blockers. I'll
>>>>> follow up with RC3 as soon as the 2 remaining (non-QA) blockers are
>>>>> resolved: https://s.apache.org/oXKi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25 January 2018 at 12:59, Sameer Agarwal <sameer.a...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most tests pass on RC2, except I'm still seeing the timeout caused by
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23055 ; the tests never
>>>>>>> finish. I followed the thread a bit further and wasn't clear whether it 
>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>> subsequently re-fixed for 2.3.0 or not. It says it's resolved along with
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22908 for 2.3.0 though
>>>>>>> I am still seeing these tests fail or hang:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - subscribing topic by name from earliest offsets (failOnDataLoss:
>>>>>>> false)
>>>>>>> - subscribing topic by name from earliest offsets (failOnDataLoss:
>>>>>>> true)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sean, while some of these tests were timing out on RC1, we're not
>>>>>> aware of any known issues in RC2. Both maven (
>>>>>> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%
>>>>>> 20Test%20(Dashboard)/job/spark-branch-2.3-test-maven-
>>>>>> hadoop-2.6/146/testReport/org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010/history/)
>>>>>> and sbt (https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%
>>>>>> 20Test%20(Dashboard)/job/spark-branch-2.3-test-sbt-
>>>>>> hadoop-2.6/123/testReport/org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010/history/)
>>>>>> historical builds on jenkins for org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010 look
>>>>>> fairly healthy. If you're still seeing timeouts in RC2, can you create a
>>>>>> JIRA with any applicable build/env info?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:01 AM Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not seeing that same problem on OS X and /usr/bin/tar. I tried
>>>>>>>> unpacking it with 'xvzf' and also unzipping it first, and it untarred
>>>>>>>> without warnings in either case.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am encountering errors while running the tests, different ones
>>>>>>>> each time, so am still figuring out whether there is a real problem or 
>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>> flaky tests.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> These issues look like blockers, as they are inherently to be
>>>>>>>> completed before the 2.3 release. They are mostly not done. I suppose 
>>>>>>>> I'd
>>>>>>>> -1 on behalf of those who say this needs to be done first, though, we 
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> keep testing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SPARK-23105 Spark MLlib, GraphX 2.3 QA umbrella
>>>>>>>> SPARK-23114 Spark R 2.3 QA umbrella
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here are the remaining items targeted for 2.3:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SPARK-15689 Data source API v2
>>>>>>>> SPARK-20928 SPIP: Continuous Processing Mode for Structured
>>>>>>>> Streaming
>>>>>>>> SPARK-21646 Add new type coercion rules to compatible with Hive
>>>>>>>> SPARK-22386 Data Source V2 improvements
>>>>>>>> SPARK-22731 Add a test for ROWID type to OracleIntegrationSuite
>>>>>>>> SPARK-22735 Add VectorSizeHint to ML features documentation
>>>>>>>> SPARK-22739 Additional Expression Support for Objects
>>>>>>>> SPARK-22809 pyspark is sensitive to imports with dots
>>>>>>>> SPARK-22820 Spark 2.3 SQL API audit
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:09 PM Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signatures check out. Code compiles, although I see the errors in
>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>> when untarring the source archive; perhaps we should add "use GNU
>>>>>>>>> tar"
>>>>>>>>> to the RM checklist?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also ran our internal tests and they seem happy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My concern is the list of open bugs targeted at 2.3.0 (ignoring the
>>>>>>>>> documentation ones). It is not long, but it seems some of those
>>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>> to be looked at. It would be nice for the committers who are
>>>>>>>>> involved
>>>>>>>>> in those bugs to take a look.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] https://superuser.com/questions/318809/linux-os-x-
>>>>>>>>> tar-incompatibility-tarballs-created-on-os-x-give-errors-when-unt
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Sameer Agarwal <
>>>>>>>>> samee...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>> > 2.3.0. The vote is open until Friday January 26, 2018 at 8:00:00
>>>>>>>>> am UTC and
>>>>>>>>> > passes if a majority of at least 3 PMC +1 votes are cast.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
>>>>>>>>> https://spark.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > The tag to be voted on is v2.3.0-rc2:
>>>>>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v2.3.0-rc2
>>>>>>>>> > (489ecb0ef23e5d9b705e5e5bae4fa3d871bdac91)
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > List of JIRA tickets resolved in this release can be found here:
>>>>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12339551
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>>>>>>>>> found at:
>>>>>>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.3.0-rc2-bin/
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>>>>>>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>> orgapachespark-1262/
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>>>>>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.3.0-rc2-
>>>>>>>>> docs/_site/index.html
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > FAQ
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > =======================================
>>>>>>>>> > What are the unresolved issues targeted for 2.3.0?
>>>>>>>>> > =======================================
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Please see https://s.apache.org/oXKi. At the time of writing,
>>>>>>>>> there are
>>>>>>>>> > currently no known release blockers.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > =========================
>>>>>>>>> > How can I help test this release?
>>>>>>>>> > =========================
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by
>>>>>>>>> taking an
>>>>>>>>> > existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate,
>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>> > reporting any regressions.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and
>>>>>>>>> install the
>>>>>>>>> > current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the
>>>>>>>>> Java/Scala you can
>>>>>>>>> > add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test
>>>>>>>>> with the RC
>>>>>>>>> > (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so you
>>>>>>>>> don't end up
>>>>>>>>> > building with a out of date RC going forward).
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > ===========================================
>>>>>>>>> > What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 2.3.0?
>>>>>>>>> > ===========================================
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important
>>>>>>>>> bug fixes,
>>>>>>>>> > documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
>>>>>>>>> be worked on
>>>>>>>>> > immediately. Everything else please retarget to 2.3.1 or 2.3.0 as
>>>>>>>>> > appropriate.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > ===================
>>>>>>>>> > Why is my bug not fixed?
>>>>>>>>> > ===================
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> > unless the bug in question is a regression from 2.2.0. That
>>>>>>>>> being said, if
>>>>>>>>> > there is something which is a regression from 2.2.0 and has not
>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>> > correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to help target
>>>>>>>>> the issue
>>>>>>>>> > (you can see the open issues listed as impacting Spark 2.3.0 at
>>>>>>>>> > https://s.apache.org/WmoI).
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>>>>>> > Sameer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Marcelo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sameer Agarwal
>>>>>> Computer Science | UC Berkeley
>>>>>> http://cs.berkeley.edu/~sameerag
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to