In addition to the issues mentioned above, Wenchen and Xiao have flagged
two other regressions (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23316
and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23388) that were merged
after RC3 was cut.

Due to these, this vote fails. I'll follow-up with an RC4 in a day (this
will probably also give us enough time to resolve
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23381 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23410).


On 15 February 2018 at 17:22, mrkm4ntr <mrkm4...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree that this is not a blocker against RC3.  It was not appropriate as
> a
> vote for RC3.
> There is no problem if it is in time for release 2.3.0.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to