In addition to the issues mentioned above, Wenchen and Xiao have flagged two other regressions (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23316 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23388) that were merged after RC3 was cut.
Due to these, this vote fails. I'll follow-up with an RC4 in a day (this will probably also give us enough time to resolve https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23381 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23410). On 15 February 2018 at 17:22, mrkm4ntr <mrkm4...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree that this is not a blocker against RC3. It was not appropriate as > a > vote for RC3. > There is no problem if it is in time for release 2.3.0. > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > >