The vote passed with following +1. - Felix - Joseph - Xiangrui - Reynold
Joseph has kindly volunteered to shepherd this. Thanks, --Hossein On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:32 PM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > +1 on the proposal. > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 8:17 PM Hossein <fal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Shivaram, >> >> We converged on a CRAN release process that seems identical to current >> SparkR. >> >> --Hossein >> >> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Shivaram Venkataraman < >> shiva...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote: >> >>> Hossein -- Can you clarify what the resolution on the repository / >>> release issue discussed on SPIP ? >>> >>> Shivaram >>> >>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > +1 >>> > With my concerns in the SPIP discussion. >>> > >>> > ________________________________ >>> > From: Hossein <fal...@gmail.com> >>> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 2:03:03 PM >>> > To: dev@spark.apache.org >>> > Subject: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R >>> > >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I started discussion thread for a new R package to expose MLlib >>> pipelines in >>> > R. >>> > >>> > To summarize we will work on utilities to generate R wrappers for MLlib >>> > pipeline API for a new R package. This will lower the burden for >>> exposing >>> > new API in future. >>> > >>> > Following the SPIP process, I am proposing the SPIP for a vote. >>> > >>> > +1: Let's go ahead and implement the SPIP. >>> > +0: Don't really care. >>> > -1: I do not think this is a good idea for the following reasons. >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > --Hossein >>> >> >>
