FYI I’ve open two new issues against 2.4.0 rc2

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25587 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25587>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25588 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25588>

that are regressions against 2.3.1, and may also be present in 2.3.2.  They 
could use triage or review.

   michael


> On Oct 1, 2018, at 9:18 PM, Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> This RC fails because of the correctness bug: SPARK-25538
> 
> I'll start a new RC once the fix(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22602 
> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22602>) is merged.
> 
> Thanks,
> Wenchen
> 
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 1:21 AM Sean Owen <sro...@apache.org 
> <mailto:sro...@apache.org>> wrote:
> Given that this release is probably still 2 weeks from landing, I don't think 
> that waiting on a spark-tensorflow-connector release with TF 1.12 in 
> mid-October is a big deal. Users can use the library with Spark 2.3.x for a 
> week or two before upgrading, if that's the case. I think this kind of bug 
> fix is appropriate for a minor release, while I could see trying to work 
> around to keep the buggy behavior in a maintenance release.
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:11 PM Xiangrui Meng <m...@databricks.com 
> <mailto:m...@databricks.com>> wrote:
> 
> IMHO, the use case (spark-tensorflow-connector) is very important. But 
> whether we need to fix it in 2.4 branch depends on the release timeline. See 
> my comment in the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25378 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25378>
> 

Reply via email to