+1

On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 8:10 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 for 2.3.3 RC2.
>
> Thank you, Takeshi.
>
> And, +1 for 2.3.4 as 2.3.x EOL release.
>
> Cheers,
> Dongjoon.
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 6:48 AM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It wouldn't be wasted effort, as there is probably going to be a 2.3.4
>> release before 2.3.x is EOL. At least, having reliable tests on
>> Jenkins helps not miss problems with backports to 2.3.x. I seem to
>> recall something was change in 2.4.x to help this but either didn't
>> work or didn't apply to 2.3.x, so there may already be a clue in the
>> 2.4.x branch about the issue.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 9:34 PM Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Might be out of topic: regarding SPARK-24211 (flaky tests in
>> StreamingJoinSuite) I might volunteer to take a look, but if things are not
>> flaky with branch 2.4 and EOL on branch 2.3 is coming sooner (in some
>> months), I wonder we still want to tackle it in any way.
>> >
>> > 2019년 2월 7일 (목) 오후 2:21, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>> >>
>> >> +1 from me. I built and tested the source release on the same env and
>> >> this time not seeing failures. Good, no idea what happened.
>> >>
>> >> I updated Fix Version on JIRAs that were marked as 2.3.4 but went in
>> >> before the RC2 tag.
>> >>
>> >> I'm kinda concerned that this test keeps failing in branch 2.3:
>> >>
>> >> org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.StreamingOuterJoinSuite.left outer join
>> >> with non-key condition violated
>> >>
>> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Test%20(Dashboard)/job/spark-branch-2.3-test-maven-hadoop-2.7/601/testReport/org.apache.spark.sql.streaming/StreamingOuterJoinSuite/left_outer_join_with_non_key_condition_violated/
>> >>
>> >> It's among the items tracked in
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-24211
>> >> I don't think it needs to block a release as I think we believe it's
>> >> just the test that's flaky, but I'm wondering whether people are
>> >> seeing this fail when testing the release?
>> >> I did not see it fail running my tests though.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:07 PM Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>> version 2.3.3.
>> >> >
>> >> > The vote is open until February 8 6:00PM (PST) and passes if a
>> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with
>> >> > a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>> >> >
>> >> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.3.3
>> >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> >> >
>> >> > To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
>> http://spark.apache.org/
>> >> >
>> >> > The tag to be voted on is v2.3.3-rc2 (commit
>> 66fd9c34bf406a4b5f86605d06c9607752bd637a):
>> >> > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v2.3.3-rc2
>> >> >
>> >> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found
>> at:
>> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.3.3-rc2-bin/
>> >> >
>> >> > Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
>> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>> >> >
>> >> > The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>> >> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1298/
>> >> >
>> >> > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v2.3.3-rc2-docs/
>> >> >
>> >> > The list of bug fixes going into 2.3.3 can be found at the following
>> URL:
>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12343759
>> >> >
>> >> > FAQ
>> >> >
>> >> > =========================
>> >> > How can I help test this release?
>> >> > =========================
>> >> >
>> >> > If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>> >> > an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate,
>> then
>> >> > reporting any regressions.
>> >> >
>> >> > If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
>> >> > the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the
>> Java/Scala
>> >> > you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and
>> test
>> >> > with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
>> >> > you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
>> >> >
>> >> > ===========================================
>> >> > What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 2.3.3?
>> >> > ===========================================
>> >> >
>> >> > The current list of open tickets targeted at 2.3.3 can be found at:
>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for
>> "Target Version/s" = 2.3.3
>> >> >
>> >> > Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug
>> >> > fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
>> >> > be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
>> >> > appropriate release.
>> >> >
>> >> > ==================
>> >> > But my bug isn't fixed?
>> >> > ==================
>> >> >
>> >> > In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
>> >> > release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous
>> >> > release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression
>> >> > that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to
>> >> > help target the issue.
>> >> >
>> >> > P.S.
>> >> > I checked all the tests passed in the Amazon Linux 2 AMI;
>> >> > $ java -version
>> >> > openjdk version "1.8.0_191"
>> >> > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_191-b12)
>> >> > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.191-b12, mixed mode)
>> >> > $ ./build/mvn -Pyarn -Phadoop-2.7 -Phive -Phive-thriftserver -Pmesos
>> -Psparkr test
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > ---
>> >> > Takeshi Yamamuro
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>> >>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>
>>

-- 
John Zhuge

Reply via email to