+1 to testing the absolute minimum number of python variants as possible.
;)

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 7:46 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 from me as well.
>
> 2019년 10월 29일 (화) 오전 5:34, Xiangrui Meng <m...@databricks.com>님이 작성:
>
>> +1. And we should start testing 3.7 and maybe 3.8 in Jenkins.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:34 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for starting the thread.
>>>
>>> In addition to that, we currently are testing Python 3.6 only in Apache
>>> Spark Jenkins environment.
>>>
>>> Given that Python 3.8 is already out and Apache Spark 3.0.0 RC1 will
>>> start next January
>>> (https://spark.apache.org/versioning-policy.html), I'm +1 for the
>>> deprecation (Python < 3.6) at Apache Spark 3.0.0.
>>>
>>> It's just a deprecation to prepare the next-step development cycle.
>>>
>>> Bests,
>>> Dongjoon.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 1:10 AM Maciej Szymkiewicz <
>>> mszymkiew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> While deprecation of Python 2 in 3.0.0 has been announced
>>>> <https://spark.apache.org/news/plan-for-dropping-python-2-support.html>,
>>>> there is no clear statement about specific continuing support of different
>>>> Python 3 version.
>>>>
>>>> Specifically:
>>>>
>>>>    - Python 3.4 has been retired this year.
>>>>    - Python 3.5 is already in the "security fixes only" mode and
>>>>    should be retired in the middle of 2020.
>>>>
>>>> Continued support of these two blocks adoption of many new Python
>>>> features (PEP 468)  and it is hard to justify beyond 2020.
>>>>
>>>> Should these two be deprecated in 3.0.0 as well?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Maciej
>>>>
>>>>

-- 
Shane Knapp
UC Berkeley EECS Research / RISELab Staff Technical Lead
https://rise.cs.berkeley.edu

Reply via email to