I have no opinion - just figuring out the status too. I guess I'm asking first, is this the only issue in question?
Does nobody object to untargeting it? -> then we are done for 2.4.5, right? If anyone does -> what's the next step to resolving it? I wasn't clear from the JIRA / PR, or whether you are arguing it should or should not be untargeted. Or really who is arguing what about it. On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 12:04 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great. Sean. > > Then, what is your criteria to remove the targeting it from 2.4.5? > > It doesn't depend on `Who`, right? > > Bests, > Dongjoon. > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:56 AM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> OK what if anything is in question for 2.4.5? I don't see anything open >> and targeted for it. >> Are we talking about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28344 - >> targeted for 2.4.5 but not backported, and a 'correctness' issue? >> Simply: who argues this must hold up 2.4.5, and if so what's the status? >> >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:27 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, Nicholas and all. >>> >>> RC2 is blocked by the community policy on correctness/dataloss issues. >>> >>> I cut the RC1 when there were no correctness/dataloss issue targeting on >>> 2.4.5. However, it fails because one correctness issue (target = 3.0.0) is >>> resolved and the community changes the target to 2.4.5 at the last day of >>> RC1 vote. >>> >>> As of now, there exists 2.4.5 targeting correctness issue. As a release >>> manager, I cannot cut RC2 until there is no correctness/dataloss issue with >>> target=2.4.5. We need to fix it or we need to move the target version to >>> 2.4.6. >>> >>> That's the current situation. I'm trying to follow the existing >>> community policies, but it seems too idealistic for the release. I'm trying >>> to figure out what is the best option for 2.4.5 in the community. >>> Hopefully, we can start RC2 without known risks at least. >>> >>> For non-correctness issues, it's up to the progress and decision on >>> them. Those issues are not blockers. >>> >>> Bests, >>> Dongjoon. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 05:39 Nicholas Marion <nmar...@us.ibm.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Was wondering if RC2 is expected to release soon? Any chance that >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30310 could be added to >>>> branch-2.4 as well for 2.4.5 release? Especially since 2.4.x introduced the >>>> bug? >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> *NICHOLAS T. MARION * >>>> IBM Open Data Analytics for z/OS - *CPO* and *Service Team Lead* >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *Phone: *1-845-433-5010 | *Tie-Line: *293-5010 >>>> *E-mail:* *nmar...@us.ibm.com* <nmar...@us.ibm.com> >>>> *Find me on:* [image: LinkedIn: >>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicholasmarion] >>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicholasmarion> >>>> [image: IBM] >>>> >>>> 2455 South Rd >>>> Poughkeepie, New York 12601-5400 >>>> United States >>>> [image: IBM Redbooks Silver Author][image: Data Science Foundations - >>>> Level 1] >>>> >>>> >>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Dongjoon Hyun ---01/20/2020 11:27:19 >>>> PM---Hi, All. RC2 was scheduled on Today and all RC1 feedbacks s]Dongjoon >>>> Hyun ---01/20/2020 11:27:19 PM---Hi, All. RC2 was scheduled on Today and >>>> all RC1 feedbacks seems to be addressed. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> >>>> To: dev <dev@spark.apache.org> >>>> Date: 01/20/2020 11:27 PM >>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Spark 2.4.5 RC2 Preparation Status >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, All. >>>> >>>> RC2 was scheduled on Today and all RC1 feedbacks seems to be addressed. >>>> However, I'm waiting for another on-going correctness PR. >>>> >>>> *https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27233* >>>> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27233> >>>> [SPARK-29701][SQL] Correct behaviours of group analytical queries >>>> when empty input given >>>> >>>> Unlike the other correctness issues (I sent previsouly), this one is >>>> active enough to make RC2 fail. As we know, Spark 2.4.5 RC1 vote failed >>>> because the correctness patch landed on `master` branch during the RC1 vote >>>> period and there was official requests for backporting. >>>> >>>> *https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27229* >>>> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27229> >>>> [SPARK-29708][SQL][2.4] Correct aggregated values when grouping >>>> sets are duplicated >>>> >>>> It's risk to start RC2 without considering it because VOTE is also >>>> consuming the community resources. >>>> >>>> BTW, if there is another on-going notable PR for 2.4.5 RC1, please >>>> reply to me. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Dongjoon. >>>> >>>> >>>>
