Feel free to open another issue, I just used that one since it describes this and doesn't appear to be done.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:03 PM Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: > UPDATE: Sorry I just missed the PR ( > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28026). I still think it'd be nice > to avoid recycling the JIRA issue which was resolved before. Shall we have > a new JIRA issue with linking to SPARK-30098, and set proper priority? > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 7:59 AM Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Would it be better to prioritize this to make sure the change is included >> in Spark 3.0? (Maybe filing an issue and set as a blocker) >> >> Looks like there's consensus that SPARK-30098 brought ambiguous issue >> which should be fixed (though the consideration of severity seems to be >> different), and once we notice the issue it would be really odd if we >> publish it as it is, and try to fix it later (the fix may not be even >> included in 3.0.x as it might bring behavioral change). >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 3:37 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ryan, >>> >>> It's great to hear that you are cleaning up this long-standing mess. >>> Please let me know if you hit any problems that I can help with. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Wenchen >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:16 AM Nicholas Chammas < >>> nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:46 AM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> 2. PARTITIONED BY colTypeList: I think we can support it in the >>>>> unified syntax. Just make sure it doesn't appear together with PARTITIONED >>>>> BY transformList. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Another side note: Perhaps as part of (or after) unifying the CREATE >>>> TABLE syntax, we can also update Catalog.createTable() to support >>>> creating partitioned tables >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31001>. >>>> >>> -- Ryan Blue Software Engineer Netflix
