+1 (binding)

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:22 PM DB Tsai <dbt...@dbtsai.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Sincerely,
>
> DB Tsai
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Web: https://www.dbtsai.com
> PGP Key ID: 42E5B25A8F7A82C1
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:03 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dongjoon.
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 6:37 AM Russell Spitzer <
> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 (non-binding) ran the new SCC DSV2 suite and all other tests, no
> issues
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 11:12 PM Yin Huai <yh...@databricks.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I am wondering if it makes more sense to not count Saturday and
> Sunday. I doubt that any serious testing work was done during this past
> weekend. Can we only count business days in the voting process?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Yin
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 3:24 PM Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 3:21 PM Jungtaek Lim <
> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm seeing the effort of including the correctness issue SPARK-28067
> [1] to 3.0.0 via SPARK-31894 [2]. That doesn't seem to be a regression so
> technically doesn't block the release, so while it'd be good to weigh its
> worth (it requires some SS users to discard the state so might bring less
> frightened requiring it in major version upgrade), it looks to be optional
> to include SPARK-28067 to 3.0.0.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Besides, I see all blockers look to be resolved, thanks all for the
> amazing efforts!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) if the decision of SPARK-28067 is "later".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28067
> >>>>> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-31894
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 5:23 AM Matei Zaharia <
> matei.zaha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Matei
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Jun 7, 2020, at 6:53 AM, Maxim Gekk <maxim.g...@databricks.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:34 PM Takeshi Yamamuro <
> linguin....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I don't see any ongoing PR to fix critical bugs in my area.
> >>>>>>> Bests,
> >>>>>>> Takeshi
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 7:24 PM Mridul Muralidharan <
> mri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>> Mridul
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 1:20 PM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Apologies for the mistake. The vote is open till 11:59pm Pacific
> time on Mon June 9th.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 1:08 PM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Spark version 3.0.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The vote is open until [DUE DAY] and passes if a majority +1
> PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.0.0
> >>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
> http://spark.apache.org/
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is v3.0.0-rc3 (commit
> 3fdfce3120f307147244e5eaf46d61419a723d50):
> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.0.0-rc3
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.0.0-rc3-bin/
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1350/
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.0.0-rc3-docs/
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The list of bug fixes going into 3.0.0 can be found at the
> following URL:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12339177
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> This release is using the release script of the tag v3.0.0-rc3.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> FAQ
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> =========================
> >>>>>>>>>> How can I help test this release?
> >>>>>>>>>> =========================
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by
> taking
> >>>>>>>>>> an existing Spark workload and running on this release
> candidate, then
> >>>>>>>>>> reporting any regressions.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and
> install
> >>>>>>>>>> the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the
> Java/Scala
> >>>>>>>>>> you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers
> and test
> >>>>>>>>>> with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache
> before/after so
> >>>>>>>>>> you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ===========================================
> >>>>>>>>>> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.0.0?
> >>>>>>>>>> ===========================================
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.0.0 can be found
> at:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for
> "Target Version/s" = 3.0.0
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important
> bug
> >>>>>>>>>> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility
> should
> >>>>>>>>>> be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
> >>>>>>>>>> appropriate release.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ==================
> >>>>>>>>>> But my bug isn't fixed?
> >>>>>>>>>> ==================
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
> >>>>>>>>>> release unless the bug in question is a regression from the
> previous
> >>>>>>>>>> release. That being said, if there is something which is a
> regression
> >>>>>>>>>> that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a
> committer to
> >>>>>>>>>> help target the issue.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>> Takeshi Yamamuro
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to