I think this is a good idea, and yes keeping it backwards compatible initially is important since we missed the boat on Spark 3. I like the Controller/Leader one since I think that does a good job of reflecting the codes role.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:01 AM Tom Graves <tgraves...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I filed jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32333 to remove > references to Master. I realize this is a bigger change then the slave > jira but I wanted to get folks input on if they are ok with making the > change and if so we would need to pick a name to use instead. I think we > should keep it backwards compatible at first as to not break anyone and > depending on what we find might break it up into multiple smaller liras. > > A few name possibilities: > - ApplicationManager > - StandaloneClusterManager > - Coordinator > - Primary > - Controller > > Thoughts or suggestions? > > Thanks, > Tom > > > -- Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau
