Hey,
I'm just curious what the status of the 3.0.1 release is? Do we have some
blockers we are waiting on?
Thanks,Tom
On Sunday, August 16, 2020, 09:07:44 PM CDT, ruifengz
<ruife...@foxmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for letting us know this issue.
On 8/16/20 11:31 PM, Takeshi Yamamuro wrote:
I've checked the Jenkins log and It seems the commit from
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29404 caused the failure.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 10:43 PM Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> wrote:
i noticed commit today that seems to prepare for 3.0.1-rc1: commit
05144a5c10cd37ebdbb55fde37d677def49af11f
Author: Ruifeng Zheng <ruife...@apache.org>
Date: Sat Aug 15 01:37:47 2020 +0000
Preparing Spark release v3.0.1-rc1
so i tried to build spark on that commit and i get failure in sql:
09:36:57.371 ERROR org.apache.spark.scheduler.TaskSetManager: Task 0 in stage
77.0 failed 1 times; aborting job
[info] - SPARK-28224: Aggregate sum big decimal overflow *** FAILED *** (306
milliseconds)
[info] org.apache.spark.SparkException: Job aborted due to stage failure:
Task 0 in stage 77.0 failed 1 times, most recent failure: Lost task 0.0 in
stage 77.0 (TID 197, 192.168.11.17, executor driver):
java.lang.ArithmeticException:
Decimal(expanded,111111111111111111110.246000000000000000,39,18}) cannot be
represented as Decimal(38, 18).
[info] at org.apache.spark.sql.types.Decimal.toPrecision(Decimal.scala:369)
[info]
atorg.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage2.agg_doAggregate_sum_0$(Unknown
Source)
[info]
atorg.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage2.agg_doConsume_0$(Unknown
Source)
[info]
atorg.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage2.agg_doAggregateWithoutKey_0$(Unknown
Source)
[info]
atorg.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage2.processNext(Unknown
Source)
[info]
atorg.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
[info]
atorg.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:729)
[info] at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$10.hasNext(Iterator.scala:458)
[info] at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$10.hasNext(Iterator.scala:458)
[info] at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.getIteratorSize(Utils.scala:1804)
[info] at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.$anonfun$count$1(RDD.scala:1227)
[info] at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.$anonfun$count$1$adapted(RDD.scala:1227)
[info] at
org.apache.spark.SparkContext.$anonfun$runJob$5(SparkContext.scala:2138)
[info] at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:90)
[info] at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:127)
[info]
atorg.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.$anonfun$run$3(Executor.scala:446)
[info] at org.apache.spark.util.Utils$.tryWithSafeFinally(Utils.scala:1377)
[info] at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:449)
[info]
atjava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
[info]
atjava.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
[info] at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
[error] Failed tests:
[error] org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameSuite
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 8:19 PM Jason Moore
<jason.mo...@quantium.com.au.invalid> wrote:
Thank you so much! Any update on getting the RC1 up for vote?
Jason.
From: 郑瑞峰 <ruife...@foxmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 5 August 2020 12:54 PM
To: Jason Moore <jason.mo...@quantium.com.au.INVALID>; Spark dev list
<dev@spark.apache.org>
Subject: 回复： [DISCUSS] Apache Spark 3.0.1 Release Hi all, I am going to
prepare the realease of 3.0.1 RC1, with the help of Wenchen.
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "Jason Moore"
<jason.mo...@quantium.com.au.INVALID>; 发送时间: 2020年7月30日(星期四) 上午10:35 收件人:
"dev"<dev@spark.apache.org>; 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Spark 3.0.1 Release
Hi all,
Discussion around 3.0.1 seems to have trickled away. What was blocking the
release process kicking off? I can see some unresolved bugs raised against
3.0.0, but conversely there were quite a few critical correctness fixes waiting
to be released.
Cheers,
Jason.
From: Takeshi Yamamuro <linguin....@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 9:00 am
To: Shivaram Venkataraman <shiva...@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: "dev@spark.apache.org" <dev@spark.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Spark 3.0.1 Release
> Just wanted to check if there are any blockers that we are still waiting for
> to start the new release process.
I don't see any on-going blocker in my area.
Thanks for the notification.
Bests,
Tkaeshi
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 4:03 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, Yi.
Could you explain why you think that is a blocker? For the given example from
the JIRA description,
spark.udf.register("key", udf((m: Map[String, String]) =>
m.keys.head.toInt)) Seq(Map("1" -> "one", "2" ->
"two")).toDF("a").createOrReplaceTempView("t") checkAnswer(sql("SELECT
key(a) AS k FROM t GROUP BY key(a)"), Row(1) :: Nil)
Apache Spark 3.0.0 seems to work like the following.
scala> spark.version
res0: String = 3.0.0
scala> spark.udf.register("key", udf((m: Map[String, String]) =>
m.keys.head.toInt))
res1: org.apache.spark.sql.expressions.UserDefinedFunction
=SparkUserDefinedFunction($Lambda$1958/948653928@5d6bed7b,IntegerType,List(Some(class[value[0]:map<string,string>])),None,false,true)
scala> Seq(Map("1" -> "one", "2" ->
"two")).toDF("a").createOrReplaceTempView("t")
scala> sql("SELECT key(a) AS k FROM t GROUP BY key(a)").collect
res3: Array[org.apache.spark.sql.Row] = Array([1])
Could you provide a reproducible example?
Bests,
Dongjoon.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:04 AM Yi Wu <yi...@databricks.com> wrote:
This probably be a blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32307
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:13 PM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32234 ?
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 9:57 AM Shivaram Venkataraman
<shiva...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> Just wanted to check if there are any blockers that we are still waiting for
> to start the new release process.
>
> Thanks
> Shivaram
>
--
---
Takeshi Yamamuro
--
---
Takeshi Yamamuro
