Hi Tom,

I will cut RC3 right after SPARK-36772
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36772>is resolved.

Thanks,
Gengliang

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 10:03 PM Tom Graves <tgraves...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hey folks,
>
> just curious what the status was on doing an rc3?  I didn't see any
> blockers left since it looks like parquet change got merged.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
> On Thursday, September 9, 2021, 12:27:58 PM CDT, Mridul Muralidharan <
> mri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> I have filed a blocker, SPARK-36705
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36705> which will need to be
> addressed.
>
> Regards,
> Mridul
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 8:47 AM Gengliang Wang <ltn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> the voting fails.
> Liang-Chi reported a new block SPARK-36669
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36669>. We will have RC3
> when the existing issues are resolved.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:01 AM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This RC looks OK to me too, understanding we may need to have RC3 for the
> outstanding issues though.
>
> The issue with the Scala 2.13 POM is still there; I wasn't able to figure
> it out (anyone?), though it may not affect 'normal' usage (and is
> work-around-able in other uses, it seems), so may be sufficient if Scala
> 2.13 support is experimental as of 3.2.0 anyway.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 2:08 AM Gengliang Wang <ltn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as
> Apache Spark version 3.2.0.
>
> The vote is open until 11:59pm Pacific time September 3 and passes if a
> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.2.0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see http://spark.apache.org/
>
> The tag to be voted on is v3.2.0-rc2 (commit
> 6bb3523d8e838bd2082fb90d7f3741339245c044):
> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v3.2.0-rc2
>
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.2.0-rc2-bin/
>
> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1389
>
> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v3.2.0-rc2-docs/
>
> The list of bug fixes going into 3.2.0 can be found at the following URL:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12349407
>
> This release is using the release script of the tag v3.2.0-rc2.
>
>
> FAQ
>
> =========================
> How can I help test this release?
> =========================
> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
> reporting any regressions.
>
> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
> the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala
> you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test
> with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
> you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
>
> ===========================================
> What should happen to JIRA tickets still targeting 3.2.0?
> ===========================================
> The current list of open tickets targeted at 3.2.0 can be found at:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK and search for "Target
> Version/s" = 3.2.0
>
> Committers should look at those and triage. Extremely important bug
> fixes, documentation, and API tweaks that impact compatibility should
> be worked on immediately. Everything else please retarget to an
> appropriate release.
>
> ==================
> But my bug isn't fixed?
> ==================
> In order to make timely releases, we will typically not hold the
> release unless the bug in question is a regression from the previous
> release. That being said, if there is something which is a regression
> that has not been correctly targeted please ping me or a committer to
> help target the issue.
>
>

Reply via email to