Thanks Gabor and Dongjoon for supporting this!

Bump to reach more eyes. If there is no further voice on this in a couple
of days, I'll consider it as a lazy consensus and submit a PR to this.

On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 3:32 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> I agree with Jungtaek and Gabor about switching the default value of
> configurations with the migration guide.
>
> Dongjoon
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 12:46 AM Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jungtaek,
>>
>> Good to hear that the new approach is working fine. +1 from my side.
>>
>> BR,
>> G
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 4:12 AM Jungtaek Lim <
>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose flipping the default value of Kafka offset
>>> fetching config. The context is following:
>>>
>>> Before Spark 3.1, there was only one approach on fetching offset, using
>>> consumer.poll(0). This has been pointed out as a root cause for hang since
>>> there is no timeout for metadata fetch.
>>>
>>> In Spark 3.1, we addressed this via introducing a new approach on
>>> fetching offset, via SPARK-32032
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32032>. Since the new
>>> approach leverages AdminClient and consumer group is no longer needed for
>>> fetching offset, required security ACLs are loosen.
>>>
>>> Reference:
>>> https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/structured-streaming-kafka-integration.html#offset-fetching
>>>
>>> There was some concern about behavioral change on the security model
>>> hence we couldn't make the new approach by default.
>>>
>>> During the time, we have observed various Kafka connector related issues
>>> which came from old offset fetching (e.g. hang, issues on rebalance on
>>> customer group, etc.) and we fixed many of these issues via simply flipping
>>> the config.
>>>
>>> Based on this, I would consider the default value as "incorrect". The
>>> security-related behavioral change would be introduced inevitably (they can
>>> set topic based ACL rule), but most people will get benefited. IMHO this is
>>> something we can deal with release/migration note.
>>>
>>> Would like to hear the voices on this.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>
>>

Reply via email to