Hi, All and Matei (as the Chair of Spark PMC). For the ASF policy violation part, here is a legal recommendation documentation (draft) from `legal-discuss@`.
https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/downstream.html#source > A version number must be used that both clearly differentiates it from an Apache Software Foundation release and clearly identifies the Apache Software Foundation version on which the software is based. In short, Databricks should not claim its product like "Apache Spark 3.4.0". The version number should clearly differentiate it from Apache Spark 3.4.0. I hope we can conclude this together in this way and move our focus forward to the other remaining issues. To Matei, could you do the legal follow-up officially with Databricks with the above info? If there is a person to do this, I believe you are the best person to drive this. Thank you in advance. Dongjoon. On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 2:49 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> wrote: > It goes to "legal-discuss@". > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/mzhggd0rpz8t4d7vdsbhkp38mvd3lty4 > > I hope we can conclude the legal part clearly and shortly in one way or > another which we will follow with confidence. > > Dongjoon > > On 2023/06/06 20:06:42 Dongjoon Hyun wrote: > > Thank you, Sean, Mich, Holden, again. > > > > For this specific part, let's ask the ASF board via bo...@apache.org to > > find a right answer because it's a controversial legal issue here. > > > > > I think you'd just prefer Databricks make a different choice, which is > > legitimate, but, an issue to take up with Databricks, not here. > > > > Dongjoon. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > >
