Thanks all for participating! The vote passed. I'll send out the result in a separate thread.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 9:43 AM bo yang <bobyan...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 7:19 AM Tom Graves <tgraves...@yahoo.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> Similar as others, will be interested in working out api's and details >> but overall in favor of it. >> >> +1 >> >> Tom Graves >> On Monday, March 11, 2024 at 11:25:38 AM CDT, Mridul Muralidharan < >> mri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> I am supportive of the proposal - this is a step in the right direction >> ! >> Additional metadata (explicit and inferred) for log records, and exposing >> them for indexing is extremely useful. >> >> The specifics of the API still need some work IMO and does not need to be >> this disruptive, but I consider that is orthogonal to this vote itself - >> and something we need to iterate upon during PR reviews. >> >> +1 >> >> Regards, >> Mridul >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:09 AM Mich Talebzadeh < >> mich.talebza...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> Mich Talebzadeh, >> Dad | Technologist | Solutions Architect | Engineer >> London >> United Kingdom >> >> >> view my Linkedin profile >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/> >> >> >> https://en.everybodywiki.com/Mich_Talebzadeh >> >> >> >> *Disclaimer:* The information provided is correct to the best of my >> knowledge but of course cannot be guaranteed . It is essential to note >> that, as with any advice, quote "one test result is worth one-thousand >> expert opinions (Werner >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun>Von Braun >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun>)". >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 09:27, Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 18:11, yangjie01 <yangji...@baidu.com.invalid> >> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> Jie Yang >> >> >> >> *发件人**: *Haejoon Lee <haejoon....@databricks.com.INVALID> >> *日期**: *2024年3月11日 星期一 17:09 >> *收件人**: *Gengliang Wang <ltn...@gmail.com> >> *抄送**: *dev <dev@spark.apache.org> >> *主题**: *Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Structured Logging Framework for Apache Spark >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:36 AM Gengliang Wang <ltn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to start the vote for SPIP: Structured Logging Framework for >> Apache Spark >> >> >> References: >> >> - JIRA ticket >> >> <https://mailshield.baidu.com/check?q=godVZoGJGzagfL5fHFKDXe8FOsAuf3UaY0E7uyGx6HVUGGWsmD%2fgOW2x6J1A1XYt8pai0Y8FBhY%3d> >> - SPIP doc >> >> <https://mailshield.baidu.com/check?q=qnzij19o7FucfHJ%2f4C2cBnMVM2kxjtEi9Gv4zA05b3oPw5UX986BZOwzaJ30UdGRMv%2fix31TYpjtazJC5uyypG0pZVBCfSjQGqlzkUoZozkFtgMXfpmRMSSp1%2bq83gkbLyrm1g%3d%3d> >> - Discussion thread >> >> <https://mailshield.baidu.com/check?q=6PGfLtMnDpsSvIF5SlbpQ4%2bwdg53GCedx5r%2b7AOnYMjYwomNs%2fBioZOabP9Ml3b%2bE8jzqXF0xR3j607DdbjV0JOnlvU%3d> >> >> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >> >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … >> >> Thanks! >> >> Gengliang Wang >> >>
