+1 (non-binding) for classic. On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 3:59 AM Martin Grund <mar...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1 for classic. It's simple, easy to understand and it doesn't have the > negative meanings like legacy for example. > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2024 at 23:48 Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Classic SGTM. >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 1:12 PM Jungtaek Lim < >> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'd propose not to change the name of "Spark Connect" - the name >>> represents the characteristic of the mode (separation of layer for client >>> and server). Trying to remove the part of "Connect" would just make >>> confusion. >>> >>> +1 for Classic to existing mode, till someone comes up with better >>> alternatives. >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 8:50 AM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I was thinking about a similar option too but I ended up giving this up >>>> .. It's quite unlikely at this moment but suppose that we have another >>>> Spark Connect-ish component in the far future and it would be challenging >>>> to come up with another name ... Another case is that we might have to cope >>>> with the cases like Spark Connect, vs Spark (with Spark Connect) and Spark >>>> (without Spark Connect) .. >>>> >>>> On Sun, 21 Jul 2024 at 09:59, Holden Karau <holden.ka...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think perhaps Spark Connect could be phrased as “Basic* Spark” & >>>>> existing Spark could be “Full Spark” given the API limitations of Spark >>>>> connect. >>>>> >>>>> *I was also thinking Core here but we’ve used core to refer to the RDD >>>>> APIs for too long to reuse it here. >>>>> >>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >>>>> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): >>>>> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> >>>>> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 8:02 PM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Classic is much better than Legacy. : ) >>>>>> >>>>>> Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org> 于2024年7月18日周四 16:58写道： >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I noticed that we need to standardize our terminology before moving >>>>>>> forward. For instance, when documenting, 'Spark without Spark Connect' >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> too long and verbose. Additionally, I've observed that we use various >>>>>>> names >>>>>>> for Spark without Spark Connect: Spark Classic, Classic Spark, Legacy >>>>>>> Spark, etc. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I propose that we consistently refer to it as Spark Classic (vs. >>>>>>> Spark Connect). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please share your thoughts on this. Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>>
