+1 (non-binding) Thank you,
Vlad On Feb 25, 2025, at 1:33 AM, Sakthi <sak...@apache.org> wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:50 AM Kent Yao <y...@apache.org<mailto:y...@apache.org>> wrote: +1(binding), Thank you, Max! Kent Armaan Sait <armaansait...@gmail.com<mailto:armaansait...@gmail.com>> 于2025年2月25日周二 06:11写道: +1 Thanks & Regards, Armaan Sait LinkedIn: Armaan Sait | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/armaan-sait/> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 11:40 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@apache.org<mailto:gurwls...@apache.org>> wrote: +1 On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 at 11:47, Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com<mailto:cloud0...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM John Zhuge <jzh...@apache.org<mailto:jzh...@apache.org>> wrote: +1 (non-binding) John Zhuge On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 2:37 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com<mailto:huaxin.ga...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:51 PM serge rielau.com<http://rielau.com/> <se...@rielau.com<mailto:se...@rielau.com>> wrote: +1 it’s abt time. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 23, 2025, at 12:25 PM, L. C. Hsieh > <vii...@gmail.com<mailto:vii...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > +1 > >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 7:51 AM Max Gekk >> <max.g...@gmail.com<mailto:max.g...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Spark devs, >> >> Following the discussion [1], I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP [2]. >> The SPIP aims to add a new data type TIME to Spark SQL types. New type >> should conform to TIME(n) WITHOUT TIME ZONE as defined by the SQL standard. >> >> This thread will be open for at least the next 72 hours. Please vote >> accordingly, [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP [ ] +0 [ ] -1: >> I don’t think this is a good idea because … >> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/892vkskktqrx1czk9wm6l8vchpydrny2 >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-51162 >> >> Yours faithfully, >> Max Gekk > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: > dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org<mailto:dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org> >