I agree, 4.0 is already in the RC stage and I think it's too late to do
such a big version bump for the Hive dependency.

We definitely need to do this upgrade and thanks for working on it!

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 1:31 PM Ángel Álvarez Pascua <
angel.alvarez.pas...@gmail.com> wrote:

> That's great news! If you need anything from me, just ask...
>
> We should also check and update other non-Hive third-party libraries with
> high/critical vulnerabilities, as someone mentioned in another email thread.
>
> Since this is a major change, I think we should leave it for Spark 4.1.
> What do you think?
>
> El lun, 24 mar 2025 a las 0:59, Mich Talebzadeh (<
> mich.talebza...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> For now, I am testing apache-hive-4.0.1-bin which is the latest release
>> version  from
>>
>> https://dlcdn.apache.org/hive/hive-4.0.1/
>>
>> apache-hive-4.0.1-bin.tar
>>
>> My metastore is Oracle and upgrade scripts are provided..
>>
>> My previous version is Hive 3.1.1 and the metastore upgrade went OK
>> without any major headache.
>>
>> Now I just need to customise various files under $HIVE_HOME/conf and then
>> I will have some testing underway.
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Dr Mich Talebzadeh,
>> Architect | Data Science | Financial Crime | Forensic Analysis | GDPR
>>
>>    view my Linkedin profile
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 at 17:13, Ángel Álvarez Pascua <
>> angel.alvarez.pas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Well ... and then? When are we going to tackle this? I could help.
>>>
>>> El mié, 12 mar 2025, 15:50, Mich Talebzadeh <mich.talebza...@gmail.com>
>>> escribió:
>>>
>>>> Agreed. Hive upgrade is more time consuming as it involves backing up
>>>> Hive schema on your metastore and then running Hive provided upgrade schema
>>>> scripts against Hive schema that could be problematic,but needs to be done
>>>> one way or another.
>>>>
>>>> HTH
>>>>
>>>> Dr Mich Talebzadeh,
>>>> Architect | Data Science | Financial Crime | Forensic Analysis | GDPR
>>>>
>>>>    view my Linkedin profile
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 at 12:21, Ángel <angel.alvarez.pas...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Not an easy task, I guess, but I'm totally for it too.
>>>>>
>>>>> The issue SPARK-49910
>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-49910> is related to
>>>>> this.
>>>>>
>>>>> El mar, 11 mar 2025 a las 23:06, Mich Talebzadeh (<
>>>>> mich.talebza...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes I am all  for it, as I use Hive with Oracle as its metastore
>>>>>> extensively.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Case in point, on 6th March A Hive user
>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/vhgxt1cj2ppc862j0lwxl63j6nfc7khh>
>>>>>> alluded to it and I quote
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "I just wanted to highlight that Hive 3.x line is EOL. It has various
>>>>>> known security vulnerabilities, many serious bugs (including wrong 
>>>>>> results
>>>>>> and data corruption), and lacks lots of improvements and major features
>>>>>> that are available in Hive 4. Upgrading is the right path forward."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  In summary, Hive 4.x likely includes performance improvements, new
>>>>>> features, and bug fixes. Compiling against it would allow Spark to take
>>>>>> advantage of these. Plus using the latest versions of both Spark and Hive
>>>>>> is important for maintaining a secure data platform.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HTH
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dr Mich Talebzadeh,
>>>>>> Architect | Data Science | Financial Crime | Forensic Analysis | GDPR
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    view my Linkedin profile
>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 19:08, Rozov, Vlad <vro...@amazon.com.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As Apache Hive announced EOL for Hive 2.x [1] and 3.x [2], should
>>>>>>> Spark be compiled against Hive 4.x and use it as default?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vlad
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4ctrzfw60jkhc0hq2xoh1jpqxgt2zd93
>>>>>>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/99h6wr7nk4684r6tkcbm8ydfytgqy6f3
>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/50213
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to