+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Milan
On Mon, 5 May 2025 at 21:25, Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for putting this together. > > +0 (non-binding) from my side. Happy to see geospatial data is getting > attention but we need to make it right. > > > Jia Yu > > > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:15 PM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Thanks >> Szehon >> >> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 11:17 AM DB Tsai <dbt...@dbtsai.com> wrote: >> >>> +1, geospatial types will be a great feature for Spark. Thanks for >>> working on it. >>> >>> On May 5, 2025, at 11:04 AM, Menelaos Karavelas < >>> menelaos.karave...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I started the discussion on adding geospatial types to Spark on March >>> 28th. >>> Since then there has been some discussion in the dev mailing list, as >>> well as in the SPIP doc. >>> >>> At this point I would like to move to a formal vote on adding support >>> for geospatial types to Spark. >>> >>> *Discussion thread:* >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/07ozv8ccfddd5tnfl8t74dr4tvnjdkpg >>> >>> *SPIP:* >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cYSNPGh95OjnpS0k_KDHGM9Ae3j-_0Wnc_eGBZL4D3w/edit?tab=t.0 >>> >>> *JIRA:* >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-51658 >>> >>> >>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>> >>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because >>> >>> Menelaos Karavelas >>> >>>
