I'll start with my own +1.

All the known blockers are fixed, and I verified that the new Spark Connect
distribution works as expected.

On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 8:16 PM Wenchen Fan <cloud0...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 4.0.0.
>
> The vote is open until May 15 (PST) and passes if a majority +1 PMC votes
> are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 4.0.0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see https://spark.apache.org/
>
> The tag to be voted on is v4.0.0-rc5 (commit
> f35a2ee6dc7833ea0cff757147132c9fdc26c113)
> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v4.0.0-rc5
>
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v4.0.0-rc5-bin/
>
> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/KEYS
>
> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1483/
>
> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v4.0.0-rc5-docs/
>
> The list of bug fixes going into 4.0.0 can be found at the following URL:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12353359
>
> This release is using the release script of the tag v4.0.0-rc5.
>
> FAQ
>
> =========================
> How can I help test this release?
> =========================
>
> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
> reporting any regressions.
>
> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
> the current RC and see if anything important breaks, in the Java/Scala
> you can add the staging repository to your projects resolvers and test
> with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
> you don't end up building with a out of date RC going forward).
>

Reply via email to