Agreed. will be good HTH Dr Mich Talebzadeh, Architect | Data Science | Financial Crime | Forensic Analysis | GDPR
view my Linkedin profile <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/> On Tue, 9 Sept 2025 at 14:38, Enrico Minack <enrico-min...@gmx.de.invalid> wrote: > Hi all, > > maybe this is the right moment to move GraphX into GraphFrames to > maintain it there. > > Cheers, > Enrico > > Am 09.09.25 um 13:17 schrieb Sem: > > Hello! > > > > Because of deprecation of GraphX in Spark 4.x I have a question. > > Working on performance improvements in GraphFrames that is using GraphX > > under the hood, I found a way to improve the performance of the > > LabelPropagation algorithm in GraphX. > > > > On my tests (LDBC graph "wiki-Talk", 2.3M vertices, 5M edges) it > > improves the performance from ~3500 seconds to ~50 seconds. The new > > solution is slightly increasing the average memory usage per iteration > > but also it is decreasing the peak memory usage overall (the 1st > > iteration of the current implementation). > > > > I'm ready to provide all the details and explanations, fill the Jira > > ticket, etc. But my main question is does GraphX accept patches or > > because of deprecation it is not considered anymore? > > > > Thanks in advance! > > Best regards, > > Sem > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > >
