+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 7:25 AM Kousuke Saruta <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > 2026年1月14日(水) 15:03 Kent Yao <[email protected]>: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> 于2026年1月14日周三 13:06写道： >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 11:54 AM Liu Cao <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> The initial scope seems reasonable; very interested in the long term >>>> aspect in accelerator integrations. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 19:18 Rishab Joshi <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding). >>>>> Interesting problem. Looking forward to seeing the project mature and >>>>> evolve. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 7:05 PM Jungtaek Lim < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> I can't imagine the coverage of UDF for this SPIP at this point, but >>>>>> I think this is the way to go if things work out, so definitely good to >>>>>> explore. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 12:00 PM Felix Cheung < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 worth a shot, it would be great to have some improvement in this >>>>>>> space >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> *From:* Hyukjin Kwon <[email protected]> >>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 13, 2026 6:50:19 PM >>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Improving Spark SQL UDFs with >>>>>>> Transpilation >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm +1 on this as long as we can isolate the implementation and turn >>>>>>> it off by default till it's proven that it works and it's ready. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am not fully confident that it will work but I think it should be >>>>>>> worth trying. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 6:29 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 12:24 PM Holden Karau < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Folks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Discussion on the SPIP Spark SQL UDF transpilation >>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/xj8qfqvo5f9o188984mwh2kcg0fnqs9c> >>>>>>> seems to have settled, so I'm now bringing it for a vote. The normal >>>>>>> requirements is that an SPIP vote is open for at least 72 hours, but >>>>>>> given >>>>>>> that some are just returning from the winter holidays, I plan to leave >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> vote open until Sunday Jan 18th. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From the original discussion: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's been a few years since we last looked at transpilation, and >>>>>>> with the growth of Pandas on Spark I think it's time we revisit it. I've >>>>>>> got a JIRA filed <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-54783> >>>>>>> some rough proof of concept code >>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/53547> (I think doing the >>>>>>> transpilation Python side instead of Scala side makes more sense, but >>>>>>> was >>>>>>> interesting to play with), and of course everyones favourite a >>>>>>> design doc. >>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cHc6tiR4yO3hppTzrK1F1w9RwyEPMvaeEuL2ub2LURg/edit?usp=sharing> >>>>>>> (I >>>>>>> also have a collection of YouTube streams playing with the idea >>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/@HoldenKarau/streams> if anyone wants to >>>>>>> follow along on that journey). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Holden :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau >>>>>>> Fight Health Insurance: https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/ >>>>>>> <https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/?q=hk_email> >>>>>>> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.): >>>>>>> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9 <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9> >>>>>>> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau >>>>>>> Pronouns: she/her >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Regards >>>>> Rishab Joshi >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Liu Cao >>>> >>>> >>>>
