+1 on the proposal. Looking forward to seeing the implementation.

Qiegang

On Tue, Feb 24, 2026, 6:03 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks all, I also made a POC pr (for the proposed first phase), if it
> helps readers understand more:  https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/54459
>
> Thanks,
> Szehon
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 7:04 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 from me. This is a great direction to close the DSv2 partition pruning
>> gap by reusing Spark’s existing Catalyst partition-filter logic. Looking
>> forward to the implementation.
>>
>> Huaxin
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 7:58 PM Tathagata Das <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Massive +1 from me.
>>> Delta is starting to transition to DSv2 as well, and this solves a major
>>> gap we were concerned about.
>>> THANK YOU.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 8:08 PM Anton Okolnychyi <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks, Szehon!
>>>>
>>>> This will help address one of the long-standing limitations in DSv2
>>>> that is a common cause of regressions or even blockers for DSv2 adoption. I
>>>> am looking forward to implementation.
>>>>
>>>> - Anton
>>>>
>>>> ср, 18 лют. 2026 р. о 14:30 Szehon Ho <[email protected]> пише:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to propose enhancements for partition filter pushdown,
>>>>> for DSV2 data sources that support partitioning (ie, those with partition
>>>>> stats).
>>>>>
>>>>> Some DSV2 data sources, for example table formats like Apache Iceberg,
>>>>> lack partition filtering in many queries, compared to Spark-native data
>>>>> sources that directly use Catalyst (like Parquet).  This proposal can
>>>>> bridge that gap while simplifying the data source logic.
>>>>>
>>>>> JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-55596
>>>>> SPIP doc:
>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/17vcw411PxSRLWoK-BiLI56UiNdokLWtovF8JZUlDTOo
>>>>>
>>>>> Look forward to comments and feedback.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Szehon
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to