> On Jun 22, 2026, at 2:45 PM, Tian Gao <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> All I'm saying is that this is a tradeoff, it has benefits in some cases, but 
> it's not a free lunch. I support having this as a feature when users know 
> what they are doing, aka explicit consent. I'm against making this an 
> implicit default to replace the existing behavior.

OK, so are you in support of the weaker solution I outlined then? That is, we 
add a `spark connect` CLI with some accompanying user guide documentation, and 
make any existing Connect server discoverable by `.remote(“local”)`. The user 
still has to explicitly start up a persistent server.

I think down the line we want to consider making this part of the default local 
workflow, but we can revisit that after this first step.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to