Heads-up: We've addressed the blocker ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-59919. I'm waiting for
branch-4.3 CI (CI running against the latest commit) and will cut a new RC
once it's green.

On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 5:55 PM Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Looks like tickets are addressed or just waiting for CI to merge. Thanks
> all!
>
> Btw I've found a blocker which impacts Spark 4.2.0+
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-59919
> I'll ensure the fix for this blocker is landed, and trigger another RC.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 12:45 PM Jungtaek Lim <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, we can wait for both tickets. Please try best to get it done and
>> consider excluding if it takes time (e.g. an week) and there is a
>> workaround.
>>
>> I've marked SPARK-44462 (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/55410) as
>> a blocker (author is Jie Yang), but I've reviewed the PR and found a
>> couple blockers, so maybe we will have to leave it as known issue if those
>> are not addressed in the proper time.
>>
>> SPARK-59122 (https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/58419) is also marked
>> as a blocker (author is Jie Yang) - the PR got approved by Wenchen/Dongjoon
>> so I expect the PR to be merged sooner than later.
>>
>> I don't think I see other blocker tickets at this point.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 1:38 AM L. C. Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Similar to 4.1.4/4.2.1 RC1, we found that branch-4.3 also includes
>>> SPARK-59407 with two regressions: the byte-valued event-log limit is
>>> checked against twice the UTF-16 character count, and the public JVM
>>> no-argument constructor of ReplayListenerBus was removed.
>>>
>>> PR #59074 addresses these issues, along with line diagnostics and memory
>>> limits, and is still under review.
>>>
>>> Could we hold off cutting RC1 before merging the reviewed fix? This
>>> would avoid shipping the current configuration semantics and changing them
>>> in a subsequent patch release.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/59074
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 5:25 PM Gengliang Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jungtaek,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to get SPARK-59841
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-59841> (PR #59119
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/59119>) merged for Spark 4.3 to
>>>> address an inconsistency between the loadTable and loadChangelog APIs.
>>>>
>>>> Would it be possible to allow another 1–2 days for review and merge
>>>> before proceeding with the release?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 3:54 PM Holden Karau <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I’m investigating a back backport I made during some fixes and hope to
>>>>> have that resolved tonight, but otherwise I think we’re looking good.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>>>> Fight Health Insurance: https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/
>>>>> <https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/?q=hk_email>
>>>>> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.):
>>>>> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9  <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9>
>>>>> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau
>>>>> Pronouns: she/her
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 3:52 PM Jungtaek Lim <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi dev, I'm a release manager of Apache Spark 4.3.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We failed the release candidate 1 for Apache Spark 4.3.0, and I'm
>>>>>> trying to find the timing to cut the next RC. Last time I checked, there
>>>>>> are ongoing blockers (myself also filed a blocker ticket) so I kept
>>>>>> delaying to trigger a new RC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since there were a couple weeks, I would like to re-check the
>>>>>> blockers before moving forward. Instead of just checking the JIRA 
>>>>>> tickets,
>>>>>> I'd love to collect the information from folks, who own blocker ticket(s)
>>>>>> and the rationale/justification of the blocker, and what is the 
>>>>>> estimation
>>>>>> to resolve it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would you folks mind helping me to obtain the information? This will
>>>>>> be very helpful to find the timing to cut RC2 rather than blindly cutting
>>>>>> RC2 and seeing it fail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to