Thanks for raising this. To clarify, the ~5x I quoted is for line splitting
alone. I measured an end-to-end replay of a 226 MB (uncompressed) event log
into the app status store on branch-4.3: about 1.56 s with RC2 vs 1.04 s
with SPARK-60158 (the same as before SPARK-59407), so roughly 1.5x, since
JSON parsing dominates. With a disk-backed store and less compressible logs
the relative impact should be smaller. It is a performance regression
rather than a correctness issue, so I’d leave the RC3 decision to the
release manager; SPARK-60158 is already on branch-4.3 if there is another
RC.

On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 2:49 AM Holden Karau <[email protected]> wrote:

> A 5x regression on the history server loading seems like it _might_ be
> worth an RC3? I know a lot of large deployments have performance difficulty
> with the history server already.
>
>
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
> Fight Health Insurance: https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/
> <https://www.fighthealthinsurance.com/?q=hk_email>
> Books (Learning Spark, High Performance Spark, etc.):
> https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9  <https://amzn.to/2MaRAG9>
> YouTube Live Streams: https://www.youtube.com/user/holdenkarau
> Pronouns: she/her
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 6:35 AM L. C. Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> FYI, this RC includes SPARK-59407/SPARK-59804, which made line splitting
>> in the event log replay reader about 5x slower than in 4.2.0 (History
>> Server UI loading and event log compaction). SPARK-60158 fixes it and is
>> already on branch-4.3, but it landed just after RC2 was cut. It is a
>> performance regression, not a correctness issue, so I don’t consider it a
>> blocker, but it would be good to pick it up if there is another RC.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 5:30 PM <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
>>> 4.3.0.
>>>
>>> The vote is open until Thu, 15 Oct 2026 18:30:01 PDT and passes if a
>>> majority +1 PMC votes are cast, with
>>> a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 4.3.0
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>
>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see https://spark.apache.org/
>>>
>>> The tag to be voted on is v4.3.0-rc2 (commit c0fd65d3f4f):
>>> https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/v4.3.0-rc2
>>>
>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v4.3.0-rc2-bin/
>>>
>>> Signatures used for Spark RCs can be found in this file:
>>> https://downloads.apache.org/spark/KEYS
>>>
>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1538/
>>>
>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v4.3.0-rc2-docs/
>>>
>>> The list of bug fixes going into 4.3.0 can be found at the following URL:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SPARK/versions/12356944
>>>
>>> FAQ
>>>
>>> =========================
>>> How can I help test this release?
>>> =========================
>>>
>>> If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by taking
>>> an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, then
>>> reporting any regressions.
>>>
>>> If you're working in PySpark you can set up a virtual env and install
>>> the current RC via "pip install
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/spark/v4.3.0-rc2-bin/pyspark-4.3.0.tar.gz
>>> "
>>> and see if anything important breaks.
>>> In the Java/Scala, you can add the staging repository to your project's
>>> resolvers and test
>>> with the RC (make sure to clean up the artifact cache before/after so
>>> you don't end up building with an out of date RC going forward).
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to