FYI this vote ends in 8 hours.

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Reynold Xin <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> --
> Reynold Xin, AMPLab, UC Berkeley
> http://rxin.org
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Maven package could be run with -DskipTests that will simply build... well,
>> the package.
>>
>> +1 on the RC. The nits are indeed minor.
>>
>>   Cos
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:20PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
>> > In Maven, mvn package should also create the assembly, but the
>> non-obvious
>> > thing is that it needs to happen for all projects before mvn test for
>> core
>> > works. Unfortunately I don't know any easy way around that.
>> >
>> > Matei
>> >
>> > On Sep 17, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Patrick Wendell <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hey Mark,
>> > >
>> > > Good catches here. Ya the driver suite thing is sorta annoying - we
>> > > should try to fix that in master. The audit script I wrote first does
>> > > an sbt/sbt assembly to avoid this. I agree though these shouldn't
>> > > block the release (if a blocker does come up we can revisit these
>> > > potentially when cutting a release).
>> > >
>> > > - Patrick
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Mark Hamstra <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > >> There are a few nits left to pick: 'sbt/sbt publish-local' isn't
>> generating
>> > >> correct POM files because of the way the exclusions are defined in
>> > >> SparkBuild.scala using wildcards; looks like there may be some broken
>> doc
>> > >> links generated in that task, as well; DriverSuite doesn't like to
>> run from
>> > >> the maven build, complaining that 'sbt/sbt assembly' needs to be run
>> first.
>> > >>
>> > >> None of these is enough for me to give RC6 a -1.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Matei Zaharia <
>> [email protected]>wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> +1
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Tried new staging repo to make sure the issue with RC5 is fixed.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Matei
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Sep 17, 2013, at 2:03 AM, Patrick Wendell <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>> > >>>> (incubating) version 0.8.0. This will be the first incubator
>> release for
>> > >>>> Spark in Apache.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> The tag to be voted on is v0.8.0-incubating (commit 3b85a85):
>> > >>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/releases/tag/v0.8.0-incubating
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc can be found
>> at:
>> > >>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-0.8.0-incubating-rc6/files/
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> > >>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>> > >>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-059/
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>> > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-0.8.0-incubating-rc6/docs/
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Spark
>> 0.8.0-incubating!
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> The vote is open until Friday, September 20th at 09:00 UTC and
>> passes if
>> > >>>> a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating
>> > >>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
>> > >>>> http://spark.incubator.apache.org/
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> >
>>

Reply via email to