On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Patrick Wendell <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Roman, > > We can do this in the future - I wasn't sure exactly what the right > standard approach was. Just so I understand, the change you are > proposing from what is there now is just to remove rcX from the > file-names, correct?
Right. Basically your artifacts should look exactly like what is going to be released when the vote passes. Like I said -- it is a small nit, but it makes it easier for the guys like me to test the RCs in the automated manner. Thanks, Roman.
