Must be a local environment thing, because AmpLab Jenkins can't reproduce it..... :-p
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Josh Rosen <rosenvi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Someone on the users list also encountered this exception: > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-spark-user/201310.mbox/%3C64474308D680D540A4D8151B0F7C03F7025EF289%40SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com%3E > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Evan Chan <e...@ooyala.com> wrote: > >> I'm at the latest >> >> commit f0e23a023ce1356bc0f04248605c48d4d08c2d05 >> Merge: aec9bf9 a197137 >> Author: Reynold Xin <r...@apache.org> >> Date: Tue Oct 29 01:41:44 2013 -0400 >> >> >> and seeing this when I do a "test-only FileServerSuite": >> >> 13/10/30 09:35:04.300 INFO DAGScheduler: Completed ResultTask(0, 0) >> 13/10/30 09:35:04.307 INFO LocalTaskSetManager: Loss was due to >> java.io.StreamCorruptedException >> java.io.StreamCorruptedException: invalid type code: AC >> at >> java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1353) >> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:348) >> at >> org.apache.spark.serializer.JavaDeserializationStream.readObject(JavaSerializer.scala:39) >> at >> org.apache.spark.serializer.DeserializationStream$$anon$1.getNext(Serializer.scala:101) >> at >> org.apache.spark.util.NextIterator.hasNext(NextIterator.scala:71) >> at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$21.hasNext(Iterator.scala:440) >> at >> org.apache.spark.util.CompletionIterator.hasNext(CompletionIterator.scala:26) >> at >> org.apache.spark.InterruptibleIterator.hasNext(InterruptibleIterator.scala:27) >> at >> org.apache.spark.Aggregator.combineCombinersByKey(Aggregator.scala:53) >> at >> org.apache.spark.rdd.PairRDDFunctions$$anonfun$combineByKey$2.apply(PairRDDFunctions.scala:95) >> at >> org.apache.spark.rdd.PairRDDFunctions$$anonfun$combineByKey$2.apply(PairRDDFunctions.scala:94) >> at >> org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsWithContextRDD.compute(MapPartitionsWithContextRDD.scala:40) >> at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:237) >> at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:226) >> at >> org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:107) >> at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:53) >> at >> org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:212) >> at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:895) >> at >> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:918) >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680) >> >> >> Anybody else seen this yet? >> >> I have a really simple PR and this fails without my change, so I may >> go ahead and submit it anyways. >> >> -- >> -- >> Evan Chan >> Staff Engineer >> e...@ooyala.com | >> -- -- Evan Chan Staff Engineer e...@ooyala.com |
