You can checkout the docs mentioned in the vote thread. There is also a pre-build binary for hadoop2 that is compiled for YARN 2.2
- Patrick On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Azuryy Yu <azury...@gmail.com> wrote: > yarn 2.2, not yarn 0.22, I am so sorry. > > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Azuryy Yu <azury...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> Spark-0.8.1 supports yarn 0.22 right? where to find the release note? >> Thanks. >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Henry Saputra >> <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Yeah seems like it. He was ok with our prev release. >>> Let's wait for his reply >>> >>> On Saturday, December 14, 2013, Patrick Wendell wrote: >>> >>> > Henry - from that thread it looks like sebb's concern was something >>> > different than this. >>> > >>> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Henry Saputra < >>> henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > > Hi Patrick, >>> > > >>> > > Yeap I agree, but technically ASF VOTE release on source only, there >>> > > even debate about it =), so putting it in the vote staging artifact >>> > > could confuse people because in our case we do package 3rd party >>> > > libraries in the binary jars. >>> > > >>> > > I have sent email to sebb asking clarification about his concern in >>> > > general@ list. >>> > > >>> > > - Henry >>> > > >>> > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com >>> > >>> > wrote: >>> > >> Hey Henry, >>> > >> >>> > >> One thing a lot of people do during the vote is test the binaries and >>> > >> make sure they work. This is really valuable. If you'd like I could >>> > >> add a caveat to the vote thread explaining that we are only voting on >>> > >> the source. >>> > >> >>> > >> - Patrick >>> > >> >>> > >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Henry Saputra < >>> > henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> Actually we should be fine putting the binaries there as long as the >>> > >>> VOTE is for the source. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Let's verify with sebb in the general@ list about his concern. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> - Henry >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Henry Saputra < >>> > henry.sapu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>>> Hi Patrick, as sebb has mentioned let's move the binaries from the >>> > >>>> voting directory in your people.apache.org directory. >>> > >>>> ASF release voting is for source code and not binaries, and >>> > >>>> technically we provide binaries for convenience. >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> And add link to the KEYS location in the dist[1] to let verify >>> > signatures. >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> Sorry for the late response to the VOTE thread, guys. >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> - Henry >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> [1] >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/spark/KEYS >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Patrick Wendell < >>> pwend...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>>>> The vote is now closed. This vote passes with 5 PPMC +1's and no 0 >>> > or -1 >>> > >>>>> votes. >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> +1 (5 Total) >>> > >>>>> Matei Zaharia* >>> > >>>>> Nick Pentreath* >>> > >>>>> Patrick Wendell* >>> > >>>>> Prashant Sharma* >>> > >>>>> Tom Graves* >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> 0 (0 Total) >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> -1 (0 Total) >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> * = Binding Vote >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> As per the incubator release guide [1] I'll be sending this to the >>> > >>>>> general incubator list for a final vote from IPMC members. >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> [1] >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release- >>> > >>>>> vote >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Evan Chan <e...@ooyala.com> wrote: >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>>> I'd be personally fine with a standard workflow of assemble-deps >>> + >>> > >>>>>> packaging just the Spark files as separate packages, if it >>> speeds up >>> > >>>>>> everyone's development time. >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mark Hamstra < >>> > m...@clearstorydata.com >>> > >>>>>> >wrote: >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> > I don't know how to make sense of the numbers, but here's what >>> > I've got >>> > >>>>>> > from a very small sample size. >>> >> >>
