Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pull/615#issuecomment-35684291
Right. What I mean is that calling the variable SPARK_DRIVER_MEMORY might
be confusing in the context of yarn-standalone because its value would apply to
the client and not the driver (if that's the right terminology). Would
SPARK_CLIENT_MEMORY possibly make more sense?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. To do so, please top-post your response.
If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the
feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at
infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA.
---
